# DragBin vs Proton Drive — Privacy-focused personal storage

Proton Drive offers strong end-to-end encryption for file contents but does not yet ship post-quantum cryptography, leaving data vulnerable to "harvest now, decrypt later" attacks. DragBin closes that gap with quantum-resistant encryption, encrypted metadata, and unified team pricing.

## Why switch from Proton Drive

- Per-user pricing increases cost for teams.
- No integrated global performance CDN.
- Less focus on large object workloads.
- Metadata encryption coverage is still evolving.
- No post-quantum protection against future quantum attacks.

## DragBin advantages

- Unified team pricing — storage is a shared pool.
- Encrypted metadata + zero-knowledge architecture.
- Edge CDN acceleration for large file delivery.
- Quantum-resistant roadmap already implemented (ML-KEM + AES-256).
- Lower effective $/TB at scale.

## What Proton Drive does well

- Strong privacy brand and long track record.
- End-to-end encryption for file contents.

## Who should switch

Teams hitting Proton Drive's per-user pricing, agencies and creators moving large media files, and security-sensitive users who want quantum-resistant encryption today rather than waiting for a future migration.

## Related

- [Pricing](/pricing)
- [Post-quantum encryption](/post-quantum-encryption)
- [Zero-knowledge encryption](/zero-knowledge-encryption)
- [DragBin vs Tresorit](/alternatives/tresorit)
- [DragBin vs Sync](/alternatives/sync)
- [All alternatives](/alternatives)